âWhen the enemy attacks the foundations, we must be able to protect these foundationsâ (24).
âThe churchâs doctrine of the incomprehensibility of God is based upon and is the logical consequence of Godâs absolute self-existenceâ (33).
âIt is really only the Christian who can speak of implication, because no one but him really takes the idea of an absolute system seriouslyâ (35).
âThe proper way to begin with facts is therefore to claim that unless they are what Christians say they are, they are unintelligibleâ (41).
âAll men are either in covenant with Satan or in covenant with Godâ (68).
âOnce man has sinned, his intellect is disturbed no less than are his emotions or his willâ (75).
âThe average philosopher and scientist today holds to a nontheistic conception of reason and therefore also to a nontheistic conception of evidenceâ (87).
âSurely the Christian, who believes in the doctrine of creation, cannot share the Greek depreciation of the things of the sense worldâ (93).
âEither man is created by God, or he is notâ (97).
âThe assurance of the truth of revelation is the work of the internal testimony of the Spiritâ (103).
âWithout the testimony of the Spirit, even Adam and Eve in Paradise would have lived in uncertainty and doubtâ (104).
âRevelation is always testimony . . . . [i]t is always authoritative testimony and as such requires obedienceâ (114).
âThe revelation of God was deposited in the whole of creation . . . . [m]an was to be Godâs reinterpreter, that is, Godâs prophet on earthâ (129).
âNature cannot be studied fruitfully except in combination with man. Man is the reinterpreter of Godâs universeâ (134) [I know. I know. This is a two-liner.]
âThe Christian can obtain his philosophy of fact from no other source than Scriptureâ (152).
âMan is and remains Godâs self-conscious creatureâ [cf. Romans 1:19] (160).
âThe created personality is the highest manifestation of the personality of Godâ (160).
âNo sinner can interpret reality arightâ (164).
âRevelation in nature is but a limiting concept, a concept incomplete without its correlative [correlative concept is what is needed for a limiting concept to be understood] as found in supernatural communicationâ (171).
âThe foolishness of the denial of the Creator lies precisely in the fact that this Creator confronts man in every fact so that no fact has any meaning for man except it be seen as Godâs creationâ (174).
âSalvation means that man, the sinner, must be brought back to the knowledge of himself as the creature of God and therefore, to the knowledge of God as the Creatorâ (195).
âIt is a common mistake of modern theology to mix the categories of the ethical and the metaphysicalâ (209).
âThe distinction between Creator and creature has not been changed in the least by the incarnation of Christâ (212).â
âWhen sin came, it would have destroyed true prophecy. Then God gave the mother promiseâ [Genesis 3:15] (213).
âThe central miracle of Christianity, as it is in the person and work of Christ, is necessary not because man is man, but because man is a sinnerâ (219).
âMan needs true interpretation, but he also needs to be made a new creatureâ (219).
â[A] healed soul in a healed body needs a healed nature in which to liveâ (220).
âNow God, in special revelation, actually brings the true interpretation into the possession of the souls of those whom he has chosenâ (222).
âRevelation had to be historically mediatedâ (224).
âJesus was the greatest religious expert that ever lived. Accordingly, we ought to attach great weight to his wordsâ (231).
âIt was necessary that the ethical alienation should be removed in order that the original metaphysical relation be able to function normally againâ (232).
âScripture needs no additional revelationâ (240).
â[O]nly God himself can testify to the revelation that he has given of himself. Special revelation must, in the nature of the case, be self-testifiedâ (243).
All quotes from An Introduction to Systematic Theology: Prolegomena and the Doctrines of Revelation, Scripture, and God (P&R, 2007).