Monthly Archives: January 2014

Human Speech: “Response-Ability”

“Human communication was meant to be based on humans’ “response-ability” to God’s commandments. In fact, the Hebrew word for “listen” derives from “obedience.” Good speakers must first be obedient listeners so they know what they are talking about” (Quentin Schultze, An Essential Guide to Public Speaking: Serving Your Audience with Faith, Skill, and Virtue, 27).

The Church and The World

“The world has embraced lawlessness because the church has embraced lawlessness. We have carnal presidents because we have carnal “Christians.” We have a culture saturated with ennui because we are too bored, waiting for the end to come” (R. C. Sproul Jr., Eternity in Our Hearts: Essays on the Good Life, 53-54).

Book Review: The Gospel Blimp (And Other Parables) by Joe Bayly

A parable is more than a story. It is a story on target, set to shatter any listener who gets in its way. Yet a parable’s trajectory is unpredictable, except to one who knows a man’s secrets (152).

BOOM SHAKALAKA. Satire fans can direct their twinkling-eyes on this newly repackaged (and edited) read, and my guess is that fresh recruits will join the woe-singing-chorale in decrying the foibles of 60’s and 70’s Christian E.V.A.N.G.E.L.I.C.A.L.I.S.M. [Doh-Re-Mi-Fa-Ha-Ha-Ha-Ha-Ha-So-La-Ha-Ha-Ha-Ha-Ha]

Having not read satire in a while, it was a bit difficult to get back into the genre at first . . . I read a page, and cringed, read another page, and cringed some more. I had just about loosened-up to Bayly’s roughhousing, however, when . . . when . . . how do I put it? Ah, yes — it was when, for the first time in my life, I simultaneously laughed-out-loud (LOL!) and thought I had thrown-up in my mouth. Bayly’s sketches of Christian hypocrisy, neo-Judaizers, and squirrelly-Saints are brutal, indeed. But they are brutal because they are parables; they are more than a story.

Yes, these stories are on target. So, like the narcissistic teenagers who cringe when they read Catcher in the Rye–because they can relate with Holden Caulfield, The Gospel Blimp (And Other Parables) will make evangelical Christians cringe–because, if we’re honest with ourselves, we can relate to some of the less-than-honourable-characters. As the copy on the rear jacket says, “And, really, if you’re not looking in the mirror you’re missing the point.”

Read this book. And don’t miss the point.

Disclaimer: Clearnote Press provided me with a review copy of this book. 

WCF. V. Of Providence – 1. Q & A

Blogging through and answering the questions from G. I. Williamson’s The Westminster Confession of Faith for Study Classes for personal review and comprehension.

WCF. V. Of Providence. Question 1.

1. There are two errors ruled out by this section of the Confession: the first teaches that things happen by ______. The second teaches that things happen by ______.

The first error ruled out is that things happen by chance. The second error ruled out is that things happen by fate (“mechanical necessity”). Both of these errors are contrary to Scripture.

2. With which of these errors are the Arminians in (perhaps unconscious) agreement?

The former error. Generally speaking, Arminians teach “that the will of man acts without any predetermined certainty” (61). In the final analysis, Arminians teach that things happen by chance.

3. Cite a Scripture text which proves that the will of man is not unpredictable.

Proverbs 21:1, “The king’s heart is in the hand of the Lord, as the rivers of water: he turneth it whithersoever he will.”

4. What scriptural teaching about God helps us to understand why there are some things that man cannot do?

Will is determined by character/nature. For example, God cannot lie (see Hebrews 6:18); lying is contrary to God’s character/nature. Man’s will is also determined by character/nature. Man’s will is depraved; it is filth-ridden by the ethical disease of sin. This means that “so long as the character of a man is sinful and corrupt (as received by ordinary generation from Adam), there is no “chance” that he will do that which is pleasing to God” (61). Thus, there are some things that man cannot do–sinful man cannot please God.

5. Why is there no chance that an unconverted man will do the will of God, or that a converted man will not begin to do the will of God?

See latter end of prior answer regarding former question. Regarding the latter question, as I said earlier, will is determined by character/nature: “But when God regenerates a man so that he receives a new and different character, there is no “chance” that he will not begin to do good. ‘For it is God who works in you both to will and to do for His good pleasure’ (Phil. 2:13)” (61).

6. What is the difference between fate and divine sovereignty?

Fate is a matter of “mechanical necessity” but divine sovereignty is a matter of a personal (Triune!) divine decree. They are as different as the day is long. “Mechanical fate is at the very heart meaningless, merciless, and hopeless. But the certainty of divinely ordered providence is meaningful, merciful, and hopeful” (61).

7. What teachings of Scripture aid us in believing that God controls everything?

Scripture teaches that God created all things, and that both the end and the means were decreed by God.

8. Cite a Scripture text to prove that God controls everything.
Genesis 1:1, “In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.”

Psalm 135:6, “Whatsoever the Lord pleased, that did he in heaven, and in earth, in the seas, and all deep places.”

Daniel 4:35, “And all the inhabitants of the earth are reputed as nothing: and he doeth according to his will in the army of heaven, and among the inhabitants of the earth: and none can stay his hand, or say unto him, What doest thou?”

Acts 15:18, “Known unto God are all his works from the beginning of the world.”

1 Peter 1:2, “Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ: Grace unto you, and peace, be multiplied.”

Read the Psalms

“There is something wrong with a Christianity which rejects the Old Testament, or even with a Christianity which imagines that we are essentially different from the Old Testament saints. If any of you are tempted to feel like that, I would invite you to read the Book of Psalms, and then ask yourself whether you can honestly say from your experience some of the things the Psalmists said. . . . Read the Psalms and the statements made in them, and I think you will agree that these men were children of God with a great and rich spiritual experience” (D. Martyn Lloyd-Jones, Faith on Trial, 11-12).

Sola Fide

Sola Fide.
. . .
Justification by faith alone.
. . .
Galatians 3:6, Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness. 

. . .
Romans 4:3, 5, 22-25, For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness. . . . But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness. . . . Cometh this blessedness then upon the circumcision only, or upon the uncircumcision also? for we say that faith was reckoned to Abraham for righteousness. . . . And therefore it was imputed to him for righteousness. Now it was not written for his sake alone, that it was imputed to him; But for us also, to whom it shall be imputed, if we believe on him that raised up Jesus our Lord from the dead; Who was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification.

. . .
The gift of FAITH <– connects you –> to God’s Word of Promise (of imputed righteousness)
. . .
In this book, see pages 63-64 for a clarifying analogy.

EMU, CCCU, and Listening

From the January/February 2014 issue of Christianity Today, a heading reads “CCCU school mulls shift on same-sex relationships.” The short article states:

A Christian college is permitting professors to have same-sex relationships–at least for the next six months. Trustees at Eastern Mennonite University, a member of the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities (CCCU), unanimously voted to let president Loren Swartzendruber lead the school through a “listening period” to review its current ban. During that time, tenure-track faculty will not be penalized for violating current policies which restricts sexual relationships to marriage between one man and one woman.

Personally this is upsetting on two counts: First, I was employed at the largest school in the CCCU from 2002 to 2009, and it is also where I completed my undergraduate degree. This will probably become a watershed event for a watershed issue within CCCU schools. Second, my spiritual heritage (fraternal side of the family) is Mennonite.

I’m not sure where CT gleaned their information regarding tenure-track faculty not being penalized during this six month “listening period” . . . it may be implicit, but nothing is explicitly mentioned in the article from November/2013 at EMU’s website. I’m somewhat shocked EMU’s original post had open comments. The comments, however, were closed by the “Moderator” after only two days . . . they said they wanted to listen, but not just quite yet.  😉

  1. Moderator says:
    Comments on this blog are now closed. Watch for invitations to speak into the EMU discussion beginning early January 2014.

Death By Living

Death by Living is N. D. Wilson’s newest nonfiction book, and sort-of a follow-up to 2009’s Notes from the Tilt-A-Whirl. I read Notes in 2009, and re-read it in 2010 . . . I also led a men’s book study/discussion group over the book. Notes was a fun read. Humorous and rewarding. But at points the prose was forced. However, I just finished reading Death by Living, and it is a great book. Overall, less humorous, but the prose is tight. Reading this book was effortless and sheer joy. Oh, and convicting. 

“Two Things”

“Young men, I beseech you earnestly, beware of pride. Two things are said to be very rare sights in the world–one is a young man that is humble, and the other is an old man that is content. I fear that this is only too true” (J.C. Ryle, Thoughts for Young Men, 23).