The more Satan has endeavored to dishonor marriage, the more should we vindicate it from all reproach and abuse, that it may receive its due reverence.

John Calvin’s Commentary on Genesis 2:22

Research into New Testament literature has increasingly, albeit slowly, opened up to include in its exegesis historical studies of the society and economy of the Hellenistic and Roman worlds. New insights into Roman social structure, the role of the family, ancient associations, and Roman law, as well as economic aspects, have all enhanced research into the sociohistorical dimensions of the events depicted in the Gospels and the history of early Christian communities, and have helped to illuminate the origins of early Christianity in its ancient social context. However, the sociohistorical studies that have been employed are based primarily on historical accounts, biographies of emperors, honorary inscriptions, and Roman jurisdiction which inform us first and foremost about the elites of the Roman world. As such, they tell us very little about the common people who predominate the gospels in early Christian writings. . . . Papyri and the Social World of the New Testament aims to focus on the lower classes of Roman provincial society. . . . Admittedly, conducting in-depth studies of the common people in Roman Galilee or Judaea, where most of the New Testament accounts are anchored, is nearly impossible due to a lack of sources. It is in the nearby Roman province of Egypt — and there alone — that we find sources in large quantities that provide information on the everyday lives of the Roman provincial middle and lower classes. Hundreds of thousands of papyri, preserved by favorable environmental conditions, report on details of life in Roman times, including individuals’ daily fears and worries, which are unavailable with this degree of quality and in this quantity in any other sources. . . . The immediate and personal character of papyri and ostraca grants us insights into the lives and ordinary existence of the majority of the population, thereby constituting a particularly fascinating type of ancient source. The documents permit the ordinary people of the ancient world to speak to us just as they spoke to one another. The voices of those who never appear in ancient literature — artisans, peasants, shepherds, and fishermen, their wives and children — are suddenly heard.

Sabine R. Huebner, Papyri and the Social World of the New Testament, 1-3.

Certainly more is implied than a single substitutionary exchange. Because the text reads χάριν . . . χάριτος (and not, e.g., χάριν . . . ἀντὶ νόμου), the reference is to “one blessing taking the place of another in succession” (Regard 68), to replenished grace, to a rapid and perpetual succession of blessings, as though there were no interval between the arrival of one blessing and the receipt of the next. “God’s favor comes in ever new streams” (BDAG 88a), or as Robertson puts it, “As the days come and go a new supply takes the place of the grace already bestowed as wave follows wave upon the shore” (574). The nature of the constantly renewed grace remains undefined but probably refers to the multiplied spiritual benefits of the new covenant (e.g., 1:17). 

Murray J. Harris, Exegetical Guide to the Greek New Testament: John, 38.

Tracing the history and pathology of confessional declension will give us a sense of how rapidly minor concessions to pressure can lead to doctrinal moderatism and even indifferentism.

Ian Hamilton, The Erosion of Calvinist Orthodoxy: Drifting from the Truth in Confessional Scottish Churches, 17.

He will feed his flock like a shepherd; he will gather the lambs in his arms, and carry them in his bosom, and gently lead the mother sheep. . . . He gives power to the faint, and strengthens the powerless. . . . but those who wait for the LORD shall renew their strength, they shall mount up with wings like eagles, they shall run and not be weary, they shall walk and not faint (Isaiah 40:11, 29, 31).

Come to me, all you that are weary and are carrying heavy burdens, and I will give you rest (Matthew 11:28).

He will not break a bruised reed or quench a smoldering wick until he brings justice to victory (Matthew 12:20).

Read canonically, the New Testament gives us reason to affirm that God is solely revealed in Christ, who with the Holy Spirit, share God’s exclusive right of receiving worship. Whereas some Second Temple texts blur the line between a wide range of heavenly mediators and God, the canonical account is that there are no others who can be identified with God in this way. Though some Second Temple texts show reverence, on rare occasions nearing cultic worship, to heavenly mediators, the entirety of the New Testament liturgical practice is marked by trinitarian forms suggesting that proper worship involves Father, Son, and Spirit. Because Christ, the mediator of God, is identified with him in worship, we have laid an exegetical foundation for the doctrine of consubstantiality. Whereas angels are mediators who reveal a God that is other, meaning that they cannot rightly accept worship, the New Testament account drives us toward what modern systematicians have called God’s self-revelation and self-communication. In some sense, that is the entire dogmatic purpose of consubstantiality: demonstrating that when Jesus reveals the Father, he is also revealing his own nature.

D. GLENN BUTNER JR., TRINITARIAN DOGMATICS, 25.

We aren’t the first Christians to live in trying times; most Christians around the world, and millions of Christians throughout history, would likely trade their circumstances for ours. The cultural upheaval we’re living through will be a means of providential grace if it leads us to think more carefully about civil society, to contend for the truth more persuasively, to commit ourselves more fully to Jesus and his church, and to grow in that holiness without which no one will see the Lord (Heb. 12:14).

https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/reviews/christian-nationalism-wolfe/

New Testament Christology clearly draws on personified divine attributes and exalted human figures. For example, Jesus is identified as wisdom in 1 Corinthians 1:30. Though some have been prone to downplay this as mere metaphor, Andrew Chester marshals evidence that Paul is probably drawing on wisdom tradition that the Corinthians would have accepted. Paul not only depicts Christ, like Wisdom, as the mediator of creation (1 Cor. 8:6; cf. Prov. 8:22-31; Sir. 24; Wis. 9:2), but he also identifies Jesus with the rock in Exodus 17 (1 Cor 10:4), much as Philo identifies this rock with Wisdom and the Word. John’s treatment of Jesus as the Word of God also likely draws on such personification. . . . Second Temple intermediary figures helpfully illuminate New Testament Christology.

D. GLENN BUTNER JR., TRINITARIAN DOGMATICS, 21-22.

A robust doctrine of inspiration requires that we accept the possibility of inspired meaning beyond, though not contrary to, the literal-historical meaning.

D. GLENN BUTNER JR., TRINITARIAN DOGMATICS, 17.

I recognize that any theologian attempting to explain the doctrine of the Trinity faces the risk of overemphasizing either the unity of the persons or their distinction, favoring oneness or threeness to the detriment of the other. I am quite aware of of this risk, so under advisement from Gregory of Nazianzus, I have adopted a strategy to mitigate this danger. Gregory writes, “No sooner do I conceive of the One than I am illumined by the splendor of the Three; no sooner do I distinguish them than I am carried back to the One.” Therefore, chapters will alternate between emphasis on divine unity and divine threeness.

D. GLENN BUTNER JR., TRINITARIAN DOGMATICS, 11.